Why gazumping happens is primarily a legal issue, not a behavioural one. Under Australian property law, a sale of land is not legally binding until contracts are formally exchanged. Until that point, a seller is free to accept a higher offer, creating the legal conditions in which gazumping occurs.
Gazumping is therefore not a flaw in the system but a predictable consequence of how property transactions are structured. Understanding the legal framework that governs negotiations, contract formation, and enforceability explains why gazumping continues to arise, particularly in competitive markets.
Gazumping happens because Australian contract law draws a strict distinction between negotiation and binding agreement in land transactions.
Before exchange of contracts:
This pre-exchange period is legally non-binding by design. Until exchange occurs, sellers retain full discretion to reconsider price and purchaser, which allows gazumping to occur without breaching contract law and creates the conditions buyers must manage to avoid being gazumped.

Accepted offers do not prevent gazumping because, under Australian property law, an accepted offer does not create a legally binding contract until contracts are formally exchanged. Verbal acceptance, written offers, or confirmation from a real estate agent do not give the buyer enforceable rights over the property.
Until exchange occurs, the seller remains legally entitled to withdraw, renegotiate, or accept a higher offer from another buyer without breaching contract law. This legal distinction between agreement in principle and enforceable contract is central to understanding what is gazumping in practice.
Another central reason why gazumping happens is delay between offer acceptance and exchange of contracts. Delays commonly arise from:
Each delay prolongs the pre-exchange window, during which the seller remains legally entitled to accept a higher offer. The longer this window remains open, the greater the likelihood of gazumping.
Gazumping occurs more frequently in markets characterised by strong demand and limited supply. In these conditions, sellers face clear financial incentives to maximise sale price until legally constrained.
From a legal-economic perspective:
Because the law imposes no obligation before exchange, gazumping becomes a rational commercial response to market pressure.

Gazumping is more common in private treaty sales because these transactions involve an extended negotiation period during which no legally binding contract exists. Unlike auctions, where a binding contract is typically formed immediately when the hammer falls, private treaty sales allow offers to be negotiated over days or weeks before exchange.
During this prolonged pre-exchange phase, properties often remain advertised and accessible to competing buyers. As a result, sellers remain legally free to consider higher offers until contracts are exchanged, making private treaty sales structurally more exposed to gazumping under Australian property law.
Real estate agents do not create gazumping, but their legal obligations can facilitate it.
Agents are generally required to:
These duties align with the legal framework that permits gazumping and explain why competing offers may be introduced late in negotiations.
Gazumping persists because Australian property law prioritises certainty at exchange, not fairness during negotiations.
The legal system is designed to:
While gazumping may attract ethical criticism, it remains lawful because it is consistent with these principles.
Good faith has limited legal significance in pre-contract property negotiations. Gazumping happens because good faith alone does not create enforceable obligations.
Unless misleading or deceptive conduct can be established:
This gap between expectation and legal enforceability is a recurring cause of gazumping and underscores why buyers often seek advice to find a property lawyer early in the process.

Although some jurisdictions have explored reforms to reduce gazumping, Australia continues to rely on exchange of contracts as the trigger for enforceability.
As long as this framework remains:
The persistence of gazumping reflects legal continuity rather than regulatory failure.
Understanding why gazumping happens often raises recurring legal questions.
Gazumping happens because property sales are not legally binding until contracts are exchanged, allowing sellers to accept higher offers beforehand.
It is allowed because the law prioritises certainty at formal exchange rather than informal negotiation stages.
High demand, limited supply, and rising prices increase the incentive for sellers to accept improved offers before exchange.
An accepted offer does not create enforceable legal rights until contracts are exchanged.
Private treaty sales involve longer negotiation periods, increasing the opportunity for competing offers to emerge.
Why gazumping happens is ultimately a matter of legal timing and market incentives. Until contracts are exchanged, sellers remain legally free to accept higher offers, and buyers remain unprotected by enforceable rights.
Understanding this framework allows buyers to approach negotiations with clarity rather than surprise. For those seeking authoritative guidance on property law and conveyancing processes, LegalFinda connects buyers with experienced Australian property lawyers who understand both the legal structure and the commercial realities of property markets.

The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.
.png)