Court outcomes in South Australia include verdicts, sentencing decisions, dismissals, and written judgments issued by the Magistrates, District, and Supreme Courts. Most recent outcomes can be found on Courts SA or AustLII, while detailed records and older cases may require contacting court registries or State Records SA due to privacy restrictions.
Court outcomes in South Australia are the official resolutions of criminal and civil proceedings - covering findings of guilt or liability, sentencing decisions, dismissals, and the orders a court makes. They may appear as short registry records (for example, “charge dismissed” or “fine imposed”) or as detailed written judgments explaining the facts, legal reasoning, and final orders.
These outcomes are part of the public record and underpin South Australia’s principle of open justice. For citizens, students, journalists, and professionals, learning to locate and interpret outcomes helps confirm facts, understand how legislation is applied, and engage responsibly with the justice system.
Outcomes are also shaped by the type of proceeding involved. Summary offences are usually finalised in the Magistrates Court, often with brief registry outcomes or short sentencing remarks. Indictable offences, which may proceed to the District or Supreme Court, are more likely to generate detailed written judgments explaining the court’s reasoning.
In addition, not all matters conclude with a trial verdict. Many criminal cases are resolved before trial through negotiated pleas, withdrawals, or administrative dismissals. Aggregate data on how trials are resolved — including matters finalised before or during trial — is periodically published by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) SA, providing insight into broader outcome trends rather than individual case detail.

The level of court hearing a matter directly affects both the type of outcome delivered and how much information is made public. Higher courts generally publish more detailed reasons for decision, while lower courts may record outcomes in summary form only. This distinction explains why some results appear as short notations, while others are accompanied by full judgments or sentencing remarks.
When searching South Australian court records, outcomes may appear in several different forms depending on how the matter was resolved.
Trials resolved before or during hearing include cases finalised by guilty pleas, withdrawals, or negotiated resolutions, sometimes without a published judgment.
Judgments and sentencing remarks record the court’s formal decision and reasoning. These are more common in contested matters and higher courts, and may be published online for a limited period.
Coronial findings are usually made publicly available shortly after being handed down and are published separately from criminal judgments.
Intervention and protection orders may be issued by police or granted following private applications. While the existence of an order may be recorded, detailed material is often restricted due to safety and privacy concerns.
The Courts Administration Authority (CAA) publishes daily lists showing who is appearing, where, and when. These refresh each weekday (typically around 4 pm) for the next day’s hearings and include case numbers, party names, hearing types (mention, sentencing, trial) and courtrooms. Note that lists show scheduled appearances, not results - check judgments or sentencing remarks later for the outcome.
Completed matters - especially in the District and Supreme Courts - are published as judgments or sentencing remarks. Search the Courts SA “Judgments & Sentencing Remarks” database by party name, court and year. For broader historical coverage, use AustLII’s SA databases, which index decades of decisions and support flexible keyword searches.
For select jurisdictions and matters, the eCourts portal can provide case progress information. Treat it as complementary: listings show schedules, eCourts tracks progress, while judgments and sentencing remarks record final outcomes and legal reasoning.

With the right court identified, a structured search helps you locate what you need quickly and accurately.
"R v Smith" AND [2024] SASC to target Supreme Court decisions from 2024.Judgments and sentencing remarks follow a predictable structure. Recognising the pattern makes dense legal writing much easier to digest.
Example: “Given the early guilty plea and rehabilitation, a discount of 25 per cent is applied.” This explains sentence reduction due to mitigating factors - useful context for anyone assessing prospects of appeal or parity.

Sentencing remarks explain the why behind a penalty. They typically outline the offence, harm, the offender’s personal circumstances, aggravating and mitigating factors, relevant legislation, and the court’s evaluation of risk and rehabilitation. Practitioners and journalists use these remarks to ensure consistent reporting and to understand how courts balance punishment, deterrence, and community safety.
Open justice is balanced against privacy and fairness. Certain matters are restricted or anonymised by default, and courts may temporarily limit publication to protect victims or avoid prejudicing trials.
Even where a matter is technically public, detailed case material is not always freely accessible. Full transcripts, exhibits, and registry files are commonly restricted and may only be released upon application, often for a fee and with a demonstrated purpose. This balance allows courts to uphold open justice while protecting privacy, safety, and the integrity of ongoing proceedings.
Older judgments may not appear in current online lists. To retrieve historical material, contact the court registry with the case title, number, and approximate year. If a record has been transferred, State Records of South Australia can assist with viewing or certified copies. Administrative fees may apply. While some physical files are destroyed after statutory periods, many judgments of legal significance remain preserved digitally (often on AustLII).
As a general rule, most historical court records in South Australia are closed for extended periods, often up to 100 years, unless specific access permissions apply. State Records of South Australia manages many of these archived materials, but access typically requires a formal enquiry rather than online search. For this reason, older case outcomes are best confirmed through registries or authorised archival requests rather than public databases alone.
Even experienced researchers hit roadblocks. Avoid these pitfalls to save time and reduce false negatives.
Publishing judgments supports accountability, consistency, and community trust. South Australia’s digital access has expanded significantly in recent years, with strong public usage of online judgment portals. At the same time, courts routinely redact sensitive details or delay publication to protect victims while preserving open justice.
Unofficial sites sometimes mirror court documents. Always verify authenticity before relying on a decision for research or reporting.
courts.sa.gov.au or austlii.edu.au.When in doubt, cross-check the citation on both Courts SA and AustLII. Discrepancies suggest an unofficial or outdated copy.
If a judgment could affect employment, licensing, visa status, insurance, or professional registration, obtain legal advice before acting. A solicitor can explain whether a conviction is “spent,” assess prospects of appeal, assist with suppression applications, and help secure certified copies or transcripts from the registry.
LegalFinda connects people with verified South Australian lawyers who combine courtroom experience with public-facing education. Use the directory to find practitioners by practice area and location, and get clear guidance tailored to your circumstances.
These answers address the most common questions from readers seeking South Australian court information.
Yes - if it’s public. Use your case number or party name on Courts SA or AustLII. Older or restricted matters may require a registry request and proof of identity.
Typically within 1–5 business days after delivery, although complex or reserved decisions can take longer.
The matter may be suppressed, involve a minor, or be concluded without a published judgment. Suppressed cases do not appear on public portals.
No. Sentencing remarks explain the reasoning behind a penalty in criminal matters. Judgments are comprehensive written reasons that can appear in both criminal and civil cases.
De-indexing is only possible in limited circumstances (e.g., a court order or strong privacy basis). Seek legal advice before making any request.
Some expire automatically after a related trial or fixed period; others remain until varied or revoked by the court.
Contact the court registry with the case title, number, and approximate date, or consult State Records SA. Fees may apply for retrieval or certification. Where the matter is ongoing or unresolved, contacting the police or prosecuting authority may be necessary, as courts do not automatically publish updates for every stage of a proceeding.
Only where lawful and relevant. Improper use may breach privacy or discrimination laws. When uncertain, seek advice.
No. Commonwealth matters are federal (e.g., FCFCOA or High Court) and follow national law. Many family law decisions are pseudonymised.
Online copies are typically free. Certified or archived copies from registries usually attract administrative fees.

The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.