Mediation is one of the most effective and legally recognised processes for resolving child custody disputes in Australia. Governed by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), mediation—formally known as Family Dispute Resolution (FDR)—is designed to help separating parents reach mutually acceptable parenting arrangements before resorting to litigation.
This article explains the legal, procedural, and practical benefits of mediation, how it compares with court proceedings, and why it has become the preferred pathway for most Australian families. If you are unsure how to prepare or require tailored advice, finding a good family lawyer early in the process can help you understand your rights and improve mediation outcomes.
Under Australian family law, child custody mediation (Family Dispute Resolution) is a structured negotiation process facilitated by an accredited Family Dispute Resolution Practitioner (FDRP). It aims to help parents agree on issues such as:
The mediator does not decide outcomes but instead ensures that discussions remain balanced, child-focused, and compliant with legal principles. If mediation succeeds, parents can formalise their agreement through Consent Orders lodged with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA), giving the agreement the same legal enforceability as a court order.
Before exploring the legal benefits of using mediation for child custody disputes, it is important to understand that mediation is not only a practical tool—it is a structured legal mechanism integrated into Australia’s family law framework. It carries procedural weight under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and is recognised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia as a formal step toward dispute resolution.
Below is a breakdown of the specific legal advantages mediation offers to parents navigating custody conflicts.
Under section 60I of the Family Law Act 1975, parents must attempt Family Dispute Resolution before applying for parenting orders, except in cases involving family violence, child abuse, or urgency. Participating in mediation demonstrates compliance with this statutory requirement and may strengthen a party’s credibility in future proceedings.
Court proceedings are often lengthy and financially draining, involving legal representation, expert reports, and multiple hearings. Mediation is considerably more cost-effective, reducing legal expenses while achieving faster, mutually beneficial outcomes.
Unlike court hearings, mediation sessions are private and protected by law. Statements made during mediation are inadmissible in court, except where required to protect a child’s safety. This confidentiality encourages honest dialogue and protects both parties from prejudicial use of statements.
Mediation allows parents—not a judge—to determine what arrangements serve their child’s best interests. This autonomy aligns with the Family Law Act’s emphasis on parental responsibility and cooperative decision-making.
Mediation promotes constructive communication and helps reduce hostility, which courts recognise as a key factor in protecting a child’s emotional wellbeing. Parents who demonstrate cooperation and civility are often viewed more favourably by the Court if litigation becomes necessary later.

A mediator, or Family Dispute Resolution Practitioner, plays a central role in ensuring procedural fairness and legal compliance. Mediators are neutral professionals accredited under Regulation 60I and trained in conflict resolution, family dynamics, and child safety assessment.
Their responsibilities include:
The mediator cannot provide legal advice but may recommend seeking independent counsel before finalising any agreement.
While both mediation and litigation aim to resolve custody disputes, they differ significantly in cost, control, confidentiality, and emotional impact.
Key distinctions include:
In essence, mediation preserves parental autonomy and reduces both financial and emotional strain—qualities that align with the Family Law Act’s intent to prioritise cooperative, child-focused resolution.

While mediation is beneficial, it may not suit every case. The Family Law Regulations require mediators to screen for:
If mediation is deemed unsuitable, the mediator issues a section 60I Certificate, enabling the applicant to file a case in court. This process ensures procedural fairness while prioritising safety and child protection.
Mediation produces advantages that extend well beyond the immediate settlement stage. Its outcomes support family stability, reduce ongoing conflict, and enhance compliance with court expectations.
Key long-term benefits include:
Overall, mediation fosters lasting trust, legal efficiency, and emotional resilience—delivering benefits that align with both family-law principles and the child’s long-term wellbeing.
Mediation protects children from the emotional harm caused by adversarial court disputes. It fosters stability, ensures that both parents remain involved, and supports continuity in schooling, community, and social relationships.
Under the Family Law Act, the child’s best interests remain the paramount consideration, and mediation helps parents uphold this principle collaboratively.

Mediation is financially efficient because it reduces:
Government-funded mediation services and community legal centres further enhance accessibility, making it a legally sound and financially sustainable option for most families.
Agreements reached during mediation can be formalised through Consent Orders, giving them the same enforceability as a court judgment under the Family Law Act 1975.
Yes, provided there are no safety risks. Mediators can conduct shuttle mediation, where parents negotiate separately to minimise confrontation.
Typical issues include living arrangements, parental responsibilities, schooling, healthcare, and financial contributions—all relevant under parenting order provisions.
It is unsuitable where there is violence, intimidation, or persistent refusal to cooperate. In these cases, the mediator issues a certificate to proceed directly to court.
Yes. Demonstrating willingness to mediate reflects cooperation and respect for the Family Law Act’s objectives, often viewed favourably by judges during later proceedings.
Mediation under the Family Law Act 1975 represents the most efficient, legally compliant, and emotionally sustainable way to resolve custody disputes. It empowers parents to make informed decisions, reduces adversarial tension, and prioritises the child’s welfare.
For legal advice or help finding a good family lawyer, LegalFinda connects Australians with accredited family law professionals and mediators experienced in navigating complex custody matters.

The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.