An age pension asset test treats assets in a family trust as part of the applicant’s assessable assets if they have control or a right to benefit. Centrelink attributes the trust assets to the individual when they act as trustee, appointor, or primary beneficiary. This means family trust assets are rarely excluded from the test, and legal advice is essential to confirm how the rules apply in each case.
A family trust directly affects the age pension asset test in Australia because Centrelink attributes the trust’s assets to the individual who controls or benefits from it. If a pension applicant is the trustee, appointor, or primary beneficiary, the value of the trust’s assets is typically counted as part of their assessable assets. This attribution ensures that people cannot use a trust structure to hide wealth for the purpose of qualifying for government support.
All assets legally owned by the family trust are counted in the age pension asset test if the applicant has control or a right to benefit. These assets commonly include real estate, investment portfolios, cash holdings, and business interests. Importantly, even if the trust holds the assets on behalf of multiple beneficiaries, Centrelink looks at who has effective control and distributes the value accordingly. The rules are designed to prevent applicants from minimising assessable wealth by transferring it into a trust.
From a legal perspective, holding assets through a trust does not shield them from the age pension asset test. Direct ownership leaves no room for argument — all assets are assessed. Trust ownership introduces complexity but does not create immunity. If an individual has decision-making power or discretionary access to trust assets, those assets are attributed to them under Centrelink’s guidelines.
Establishing a trust to minimise pension means testing raises compliance considerations. Legally, Centrelink applies anti-avoidance provisions to disregard arrangements designed to conceal assets. Tax implications also arise: distributions made to beneficiaries may create personal tax liabilities, and the trust itself is bound by trustee obligations under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth).
Professional advice is essential to ensure the trust deed, trustee powers, and distribution strategies comply with both social security and tax law.
No, most types of family trusts are treated similarly for the age pension asset test. Whether the trust is discretionary, fixed, or hybrid, Centrelink focuses on control and benefit. A discretionary trust, for example, may appear to limit a beneficiary’s entitlement, but if the applicant has control as trustee or appointor, the assets are still attributed to them. The only scenarios where treatment may differ involve trusts where the applicant has no legal control or enforceable right to benefit. Even then, each case is scrutinised closely by Centrelink under its attribution rules.
Australian case law confirms that trust control overrides legal ownership. In several Administrative Appeals Tribunal decisions, applicants argued that assets should not be counted because they did not personally own them. The Tribunal found otherwise, holding that appointor powers, trustee discretion, or entitlement to distributions amounted to effective ownership for asset test purposes.
These precedents underline the principle that substance prevails over form. Families cannot rely solely on legal structures to exclude assets from the means test.
Many Australians have specific concerns about how family trusts are treated under the age pension asset test. Below are clear, direct answers to common questions that arise when planning retirement with a trust in place.
Legally, Centrelink disregards trusts designed primarily to manipulate pension eligibility. Tax law imposes trustee reporting obligations and can trigger income tax consequences on distributions. Establishing a trust purely for pension reduction may fail under both regimes.
Yes. Discretionary trusts are heavily scrutinised and usually attributed back to the controllers. Fixed or unit trusts provide clearer ownership, but assets are still assessed. No trust structure is legally exempt.
Yes. In multiple tribunal rulings, assets in discretionary trusts were attributed to the pension applicant because they held appointor or trustee powers. Courts consistently emphasise control over legal title in determining whether assets are counted.
The age pension asset test and family trusts in Australia are governed by clear legal principles: control of trust assets is determinative. While trusts remain valuable for succession planning and asset protection, they do not automatically shield wealth from pension assessment.
Families considering trusts as part of retirement planning should seek legal advice to ensure compliance with the Social Security Act and tax legislation. Knowing find a good family law lawyer is essential, and platforms like Legal Finda make this process easier by connecting families with trusted professionals. With expert legal guidance, it becomes possible to balance long-term wealth protection with realistic pension eligibility. With professional support, families can structure their affairs confidently and lawfully.