In Australia, there is no fixed percentage or automatic 50/50 rule for dividing assets in a divorce. Instead, the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) requires that property settlements be “just and equitable,” based on each party’s contributions and future needs. While the Court decides every case individually, most divorce settlements fall within a 50 to 65 percent range, depending on factors such as caregiving roles, income disparity, and superannuation entitlements.
Australian property settlements are governed by Sections 79 (married couples) and 90SM (de facto relationships) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
The law gives the Court broad discretion to adjust the parties’ interests in property, superannuation, and liabilities to achieve fairness—rather than mathematical equality.
The Court follows a structured four-step methodology developed through case law, particularly Hickey v Hickey (2003) FLC 93-143:
This framework recognises that every marriage and financial relationship is unique, and no single ratio applies uniformly across cases.
Although the law avoids rigid formulas, empirical data and professional practice show consistent trends:
Legal practitioners emphasise that these percentages are descriptive, not prescriptive; they reflect patterns observed in judgments and consent orders, not entitlements set by statute.

Determining the final percentage in a divorce settlement involves more than simply dividing assets. Australian courts apply a structured assessment to ensure fairness, weighing the unique circumstances of each relationship. The following key factors are central to how the Court decides whether one party should receive a greater share of the property pool.
Contributions extend beyond monetary input. The Family Law Act gives equal recognition to:
In many cases, the party who assumed primary caregiving responsibilities may receive a larger share due to their non-financial contribution and reduced earning capacity.
Under Section 75(2), courts adjust property interests to reflect each spouse’s future needs.
Considerations include:
A spouse who has limited career prospects or long-term health constraints often receives an uplift to ensure financial stability post-divorce.
Shorter marriages may result in a distribution closer to the parties’ original financial contributions.
Conversely, long marriages—especially those with joint financial interdependence—typically lean towards parity, as assets become more integrated over time.
While fault is not generally relevant in Australian family law, wastage of assets (such as gambling or reckless spending) can justify an adjustment against the party responsible.
The case of Kowaliw v Kowaliw (1981) FLC 91-092 established that one party should not bear the burden of the other’s financial recklessness.
Superannuation is treated as property under Part VIIIB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and can be split or flagged between parties.
Valuation methods differ depending on the fund type—accumulation or defined benefit—and may require actuarial input.
The Court ensures that the superannuation division contributes to an overall fair outcome, not necessarily an equal one.

The Court’s focus is not equality but equity. As stated in Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108, fairness requires more than mathematical balance—it requires consideration of real-world consequences.
A 60/40 division, for example, may reflect fairness where one party has limited earning capacity or retains the role of primary caregiver.
“Fairness” also demands full financial disclosure, transparency, and informed consent. Hidden assets or non-disclosure can invalidate agreements and invite judicial scrutiny.
Because the determination of “average” outcomes depends on multiple discretionary factors, early legal consultation is critical.
An experienced family lawyer can:
Engaging professional guidance ensures that all statutory considerations — under Sections 79, 90SM, and 75(2) — are properly applied and documented. For couples navigating complex property settlements, finding a good family lawyer through LegalFinda is one of the most effective ways to protect financial interests, ensure compliance with the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), and achieve a just and equitable division.

The following frequently asked questions address how the “average split” concept interacts with other entitlements and legal mechanisms within Australian divorce settlements.
A fair settlement is one that meets the “just and equitable” requirement under Sections 79 and 90SM of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
The Court evaluates fairness holistically, based on contributions, future needs, and the total circumstances—there is no automatic 50/50 rule.
Settlements follow the four-step process: identifying assets, assessing contributions, considering future needs, and testing overall fairness. The Court may then issue property orders reflecting those factors.
While outcomes vary, most settlements fall between 50% and 65% to one party. The final division depends on the interplay of financial contribution, caregiving roles, and ongoing needs.
Superannuation is part of the divisible asset pool. The Court can order a split (allocating a portion to the other spouse) or flag the interest until a future event, such as retirement.
Depending on complexity and cooperation between parties, settlements can take six months to over a year to finalise—longer if litigation is required.
Legal advice should be sought as soon as separation occurs, particularly before transferring property, withdrawing funds, or negotiating privately.
Early advice ensures compliance with disclosure obligations and preserves strategic options.
In Australia, there is no universal formula for dividing assets in a divorce. Every settlement is determined under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) based on contributions, future needs, and what the Court considers “just and equitable.”
While most outcomes range between 50 and 65 percent, each case turns on its unique facts — including the duration of the marriage, caregiving roles, and financial capacity of both parties.
To ensure your entitlements are properly assessed and protected, it’s crucial to seek timely legal advice from a qualified family-law professional. LegalFinda connects you with experienced divorce and family lawyers across Australia who can guide you through property settlements, superannuation division, and financial agreements with confidence and clarity.
Get tailored advice today — speak with a family lawyer through LegalFinda to secure a fair and legally sound outcome

The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.
.png)
.png)