No-fault divorce in Australia is a legal principle under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) which allows couples to end their marriage without assigning blame to either party. The only ground for divorce is that the marriage has broken down irretrievably, proven by 12 months of continuous separation with no reasonable likelihood of reconciliation.
This means that personal fault — such as infidelity, abandonment, or misconduct — has no impact on whether the Court grants the divorce. Instead, the focus is purely on evidence of separation and the legal requirements set by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA).
Section 48 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) defines divorce as the legal dissolution of marriage where the relationship has broken down beyond repair.
The Court is not concerned with the reasons for the breakdown. Its sole focus is whether the couple has lived separately and apart for the required period — even if still residing under the same roof.
This legislative framework transformed Australian divorce law from a fault-based model into one founded on fairness, privacy, and emotional dignity. It ensures that couples can end a marriage without the need to prove misconduct such as adultery or cruelty.
Applications are made through the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA), following these key procedural steps:
Couples who are unsure about their eligibility or documentation should find a family lawyer to assist with filing correctly and avoiding unnecessary delays.
The shift to a no-fault framework brought significant legal and social benefits:
The overarching purpose is to allow families to transition respectfully and efficiently after the end of a relationship.
Before 1975, Australian law followed the English “fault” model, requiring proof of misconduct such as adultery, cruelty, or desertion. This system often encouraged adversarial litigation and public embarrassment.
The introduction of no-fault divorce abolished these requirements. Today, a Court does not inquire into why a marriage failed — only whether it has failed. Even if one spouse opposes the divorce, the application proceeds once 12 months of separation are established.
A common misconception is that fault affects property settlement or spousal maintenance. Under Australian law, the no-fault principle applies solely to the divorce itself, not to financial or parenting outcomes.
Property division is governed by sections 79 (married couples) and 90SM (de facto partners) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
The Court considers:
Only in rare cases — where misconduct causes direct financial loss — may fault have limited relevance.
Because Australia’s previous divorce system was fault-based and deeply adversarial, the no-fault divorce model was introduced under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) to modernise and humanise family law.
Before 1975, a spouse could only obtain a divorce by proving wrongdoing such as adultery, cruelty, or desertion — often through invasive court proceedings that intensified conflict and emotional distress.
The reform was enacted to remove moral judgment from marital breakdowns, recognising that many marriages fail due to emotional or practical incompatibility rather than misconduct. By shifting the focus from blame to evidence of irretrievable breakdown, the law aimed to reduce hostility, protect privacy, and encourage cooperative post-separation arrangements — particularly where children are involved.
In essence, no-fault divorce was introduced because Parliament recognised the need for a fair, compassionate, and efficient legal process that treats the end of marriage as a civil matter, not a moral accusation.
Even with clear statutory rules, many separating couples have questions about how no-fault divorce operates in practice. The following answers clarify key legal points.
Either spouse may apply once 12 months of separation is proven. The Court does not investigate fault; it verifies that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.
Yes — but its main aim was fairness, not convenience. The reform removed moral judgment and simplified access to justice while maintaining safeguards for children.
No. A sole application is sufficient if the legal requirements are met. The other party’s consent is not required once separation is established.
No. Property and financial settlements are separate matters. The Court applies independent criteria focused on fairness, not fault.
Yes. While many jurisdictions have adopted similar reforms, Australia was among the earliest to legislate a pure no-fault model that treats divorce purely as a legal, not moral, issue.
Australia’s no-fault divorce system ensures that the end of a marriage is resolved through evidence and fairness — not blame or moral judgment.
By focusing on proof of separation rather than cause, the law offers couples a dignified and efficient path forward.
If you are considering separation or need advice on property or parenting matters following divorce, LegalFinda can help.
Our platform connects individuals with experienced family-law professionals who understand the nuances of Australian divorce law and can guide you through every legal stage with confidence.
The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.