A default judgement in a child-custody case means the Court has made Parenting Orders without hearing from the absent parent. After this ruling, the attending parent’s evidence becomes the basis for decisions about parental responsibility, the child’s living arrangements, and any safety conditions.
The orders take effect immediately, are legally enforceable, and may significantly limit the non-appearing parent’s decision-making rights or time with the child. From this point, the affected parent must either comply with the orders or take formal legal steps to challenge or vary them if valid grounds exist.
After a default judgment is delivered, several legal consequences take effect:
The default judgement creates a legal status quo that courts are cautious about disturbing without compelling evidence.
Yes. A default judgement can be appealed or set aside, but only on narrow and well-defined grounds.
A parent may apply to set aside the order if they can demonstrate:
Courts will not reopen a case simply because the parent disagrees with the outcome. The application must show both procedural unfairness and a substantive basis for review. Parents often begin this process by seeking guidance to find family lawyer support before making an application.

A default child custody judgement is enforced by relying on the Court’s compliance mechanisms to ensure the other parent follows the Parenting Orders. If the non-complying parent fails to return the child, breaches time arrangements, or ignores decision-making boundaries, the enforcing parent must file a Contravention Application in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. This application asks the Court to determine whether a breach occurred and, if so, what consequences should apply.
The Court can respond by ordering make-up time, issuing fines, requiring parenting programs, imposing bonds, or in serious or repeated breaches, altering the Parenting Orders entirely. Evidence such as messages, missed changeovers, police reports, and witness statements is crucial. In urgent circumstances where a child’s safety is at risk, the enforcing parent may seek expedited orders or police assistance. In short, enforcement occurs through formal court action supported by clear evidence of non-compliance.
A default custodial order may significantly reshape parental rights, including:
The Court may retain some rights for the absent parent, impose limitations, or require supervised contact depending on the safety concerns and evidence provided.
If a parent misses the court hearing and a default child custody judgement is entered, the orders made at that hearing immediately take legal effect. This means the Court decides parenting arrangements based solely on the evidence provided by the attending parent, without input or rebuttal from the absent parent.
The parent who missed court still has options. They may file an Application to Set Aside or Vary the Default Orders if they can show a valid reason for their absence — such as lack of proper service, medical emergencies, misunderstanding of the hearing date, or other exceptional circumstances. The Court will examine whether the explanation is genuine and whether reopening the case is necessary to ensure the child’s best interests are properly evaluated. Until the Court varies or overturns the default judgment, however, the existing orders remain enforceable and must be followed.
A default child custody order lasts until it is formally changed, set aside, or replaced by new Parenting Orders. If the order is interim, it remains in force until the Court issues final orders or a further interim decision. If the order is final, it can stay in effect for years unless a parent successfully applies to vary it under the Rice & Asplund principle, which requires proving a significant change in circumstances.
Default orders do not expire automatically. They continue to operate until the Court determines that altering them is necessary to protect the child’s best interests or to reflect new, materially different circumstances in the family’s situation.

Child support is ordinarily assessed separately, but default custody orders influence:
Parents should review their financial obligations after a default ruling.
Parents affected by a default judgement should:
Professional guidance helps minimise risk and maintain child-focused stability.
Before taking the next step after a default judgement, many parents have practical questions about their rights, options, and the legal pathways available to challenge, enforce, or adjust the orders. The following FAQs address the issues most commonly raised after a default ruling and clarify how Australian family law deals with the consequences of non-appearance in custody proceedings.
Review the order, obtain legal advice, and determine whether enforcement, variation, or a set-aside application is appropriate.
Yes, if valid grounds exist, such as lack of service or a compelling reason for absence.
Rights depend entirely on the order but may include supervised or scheduled communication.
Until varied, overturned, or replaced with new orders.
Documents showing service issues, emergencies, or other legitimate barriers.
Through contravention proceedings, compensatory orders, or protective conditions.
A default judgement in a child-custody matter creates immediate and enforceable Parenting Orders that can significantly affect parental rights, decision-making authority, and the child’s day-to-day arrangements. While the Court’s priority remains the child’s best interests, the absence of one parent during proceedings limits the Court’s ability to consider their perspective — making it essential to act promptly if a default order has been issued. Whether a parent needs to challenge the decision, seek enforcement, or secure clarity on future obligations, early legal advice is critical.
Parents seeking guidance on how to navigate a default judgement can use LegalFinda to connect with and find a family lawyer who specialises in complex parenting matters and post-judgement applications. Having the right legal support ensures that every step taken aligns with the child’s welfare and protects long-term parental rights

The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.