Understanding the distinction between a family office and a trust is essential for Australian families managing intergenerational wealth. These structures play very different roles in asset management, taxation, and governance. Choosing the right model depends on the complexity of your family’s finances, succession goals, and legal obligations.
A family office is a privately controlled entity that manages the financial, legal, and administrative affairs of a high-net-worth family. It is typically established as a company or trust and is used to oversee investments, tax planning, legal compliance, estate succession, and asset governance across generations.
In Australia, family offices are commonly structured as proprietary limited companies under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). They may also operate through trust structures depending on asset classes and privacy requirements. Family offices do not just hold wealth—they coordinate and execute strategies for preserving and growing it, often across multiple entities such as family trusts, companies, and foundations.
A family trust is a legal arrangement in which a trustee holds and manages assets on behalf of designated beneficiaries, typically family members. Most commonly structured as a discretionary trust, this vehicle allows the trustee to distribute income and capital based on discretion, rather than fixed entitlements.
Other trust types relevant in Australian contexts include:
Family trusts are governed under state-based Trustee Acts, the common law of trusts, and relevant sections of the Income Tax Assessment Acts 1936 and 1997.
The fundamental differences between a family office and a family trust lie in their legal form, operational function, and governance approach. Key distinctions include:
A family office is generally recommended when:
A family trust is more appropriate when:
Before establishing either structure, it is critical to understand the legal obligations and tax implications under Australian law. Each structure is subject to different regulatory frameworks, compliance burdens, and planning strategies that must be carefully managed to avoid penalties and optimise benefits.
Beyond day-to-day administration, succession planning and governance mechanisms vary significantly between a family office and a family trust. These differences impact how control is transferred across generations, how decisions are made, and how disputes are resolved — especially within complex family dynamics.
In practice, many high-net-worth Australian families use both structures together—with the trust holding assets and the family office managing operations, compliance, and reporting.
Before choosing between these structures, families often ask:
A trust holds assets on behalf of beneficiaries. A family office actively manages wealth, legal, and administrative affairs for the entire family group.
Yes. A family trust can hold shares in a proprietary company that operates as the family office, effectively combining both structures.
Trusts offer flexible income distribution and potential tax savings. However, a family office may provide broader strategic oversight, including tax consolidation across entities.
Many wealthy families use trusts to own assets and a family office to manage legal, financial, and personal matters across generations.
Choosing between a family office and a family trust depends on the scale and complexity of your family’s affairs. For many Australian families, the best approach may be to use both in a layered strategy: the trust as the asset-holding vehicle, and the family office as the governance and management hub. Legal advice is essential to ensure each structure aligns with your tax position, estate plan, and long-term vision.