A divorce protection trust in Australia is a legally recognised structure that protects assets — such as property, inheritances, and business interests — from division during divorce proceedings.
Under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), assets held in a properly established and independently managed trust are generally not considered part of the marital property pool, provided they were not created to conceal wealth or defeat a partner’s claim.
In practice, this means a well-structured divorce protection trust can help preserve family wealth, ensure fair asset management, and maintain compliance with Australian family law.
A divorce protection trust operates by legally transferring ownership of assets—such as property, investments, or inheritances—to a trustee, who manages those assets on behalf of nominated beneficiaries. This transfer separates legal ownership from personal ownership, which can prevent the assets from being included in the marital property pool during divorce proceedings under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
The key legal mechanism is control separation. The spouse establishing the trust (the settlor) no longer directly owns or controls the assets; instead, the trustee manages them under the terms of a properly executed trust deed. Courts generally respect this structure if the trust was created for genuine financial or estate planning purposes—not to conceal assets or defeat a partner’s claim.
For the trust to be effective, it must be established with:
When these legal standards are met, a divorce protection trust can lawfully shield personal wealth while remaining compliant with Australian family law principles. Those unsure about structure or compliance should consider finding a good family lawyer early to ensure the trust meets all legal requirements.

Creating a divorce protection trust in Australia requires adherence to trust law, tax law, and the disclosure obligations imposed by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
The courts evaluate both form and function — meaning a trust that appears compliant may still be scrutinised if one spouse has dominant control or undisclosed benefit.
Essential legal criteria include:
Courts distinguish between trust property (owned by the trust) and financial resources (potential benefit to a party). The latter may still influence percentage entitlements in a property settlement if it materially affects future financial circumstances.
When structured in accordance with Australian law, divorce protection trusts provide several enduring advantages:
From a legal perspective, these trusts are most effective when established well before the marriage experiences strain and when combined with complementary legal instruments such as Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs) under Sections 90B–90KA.

A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) and a divorce protection trust are distinct but often complementary legal mechanisms.
A well-drafted trust safeguards assets from entering the matrimonial property pool, while a BFA provides a contractual safeguard to prevent later disputes. In practice, using both can create a dual-layer protection structure that aligns with statutory fairness and judicial enforceability.
Despite their benefits, divorce protection trusts are not immune from judicial scrutiny. Courts may “pierce the trust veil” if evidence shows the trust was a façade or an instrument of control. Common risks include:
In such cases, the Court may treat the trust as part of the property pool or a financial resource, ensuring a “just and equitable” outcome as required under Section 79(2).
The true measure of a trust’s protection lies in judicial interpretation. In Kennon v Spry (2008) HCA 56, the High Court confirmed that trust structures could be included in property settlements if one party effectively controls or benefits from them.
This precedent underscores that substance prevails over structure — trusts established with legitimate commercial or estate purposes are more defensible than those designed to conceal wealth.
To remain effective, divorce protection trusts must:
When these elements are met, trusts remain one of the most legally sound tools for long-term asset protection in Australia.

Divorce protection trusts are subject to Australian Taxation Office (ATO) regulation as discretionary trusts.
Trustees must comply with tax reporting and distribution rules under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth).
Key obligations include:
Professional legal and accounting advice is critical to prevent breaches that may trigger double taxation, penalties, or audit exposure.
Many Australian families already operate discretionary family trusts, which often become focal points in divorce litigation.
Where a spouse serves as trustee, appointor, or controlling beneficiary, the FCFCOA may classify the trust as a financial resource or property, depending on the degree of control.
The leading principle is functional control — if a party has practical power over distributions or management, the trust’s assets may be brought into the matrimonial pool.
Regular reviews, independent trusteeship, and clear documentation are therefore essential to preserve the trust’s legal integrity.
Yes. Under Australian family law, trusts can be challenged if they are established or used to undermine the equitable distribution of property.
The Court may set aside the trust or transactions under:
However, trusts created for genuine estate planning or commercial purposes, managed independently, and disclosed transparently remain legally defensible.

For high-net-worth individuals, trusts are a core component of structured wealth planning. Establishing a divorce protection trust involves:
Legal guidance is indispensable at every stage. LegalFinda connects clients with experienced family and commercial lawyers who specialise in the intersection of trust law and family law, ensuring both compliance and asset resilience.
Before establishing a divorce protection trust, individuals commonly seek clarity on legality, effectiveness, and limitations.
The following FAQs address these key areas from a legal and procedural standpoint.
They operate by transferring assets to an independent trustee under a legal deed, separating ownership from personal control, which limits exposure during divorce settlements.
They preserve family wealth, protect business interests, and provide intergenerational asset continuity — provided the trust complies with family law and tax obligations.
Yes. The Court may intervene if the trust was created to defeat equitable claims or lacks independence. Transparency and proper governance are essential safeguards.
Risks include invalid deeds, commingled assets, or undisclosed interests. Courts may classify poorly managed trusts as property or financial resources.
Trusts must have an independent trustee, formal documentation, and transparent accounting. Any attempt to conceal assets contravenes the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Costs vary by complexity but typically range from $5,000 to $20,000, covering legal drafting, trustee setup, and tax compliance. Ongoing management costs also apply.
A divorce protection trust is not a loophole — it is a lawful instrument recognised within the framework of Australian trust and family law.
When created transparently, administered independently, and integrated with other legal strategies, it provides a powerful layer of financial security against future matrimonial disputes.
LegalFinda connects Australians with qualified family and trust lawyers who can draft, review, and maintain trust structures that align with both statutory compliance and long-term asset preservation.

The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.
.png)