In Australian law, a breach of contract is almost always a civil matter. It arises when one party fails to perform obligations under a valid agreement, leading to loss or damage for the other party.
Civil courts handle these disputes by providing remedies such as damages or specific performance — not punishment.
However, in exceptional cases where the breach involves fraudulent intent, dishonesty, or deception, criminal liability may arise. Understanding the line between civil and criminal consequences is essential for assessing legal options under the Australian contract law framework.
A breach of contract occurs when one party does not perform as promised under a legally binding agreement. Common examples include:
Under the common law principles governing Australian contract law, such failures are civil wrongs. The goal of the court is to restore the injured party, not to punish the breaching party.
In civil proceedings, the aggrieved party — known as the plaintiff — must establish the breach on the balance of probabilities, demonstrating that the breach directly caused financial or practical loss.
A breach of contract is treated as a civil matter because it involves a private dispute between parties, not a crime against the state. In Australia, contract law falls under civil jurisdiction, where the goal is to restore the injured party, not to punish the breaching party.
When one party fails to meet their contractual obligations — such as not paying, not delivering goods, or performing poorly — the other party can sue for breach of contract, seeking remedies like damages, injunctions, or specific performance. The case is decided based on the balance of probabilities, meaning the plaintiff only needs to prove that the breach is more likely to have occurred than not.
Unlike criminal cases, there are no penalties like imprisonment or fines imposed by the state. Instead, civil courts focus on compensation and enforcing the terms of the agreement to ensure fairness and uphold commercial integrity.

A breach of contract becomes criminal only when the conduct involves fraud, deception, or deliberate dishonesty. In ordinary cases, failing to meet contractual obligations—like missing deadlines or underperforming—is not a crime. But if one party intentionally misleads or deceives the other for personal gain, the situation can cross into criminal law.
Examples include fraudulent misrepresentation, where someone knowingly makes false claims to induce an agreement, or theft and deception, such as accepting payment without intending to deliver the promised goods or services. These acts may be prosecuted under the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) or relevant state laws, such as the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).
In essence, the difference lies in intent: a civil breach stems from non-performance or negligence, while a criminal breach arises from deliberate wrongdoing or deceit.
The key differences between civil and criminal breaches of contract lie in purpose, process, and consequences:
Nature of the case:
Purpose of legal action:
Burden of proof:
Outcome or penalty:
Who brings the case:
Together, these distinctions clarify that most contract breaches remain civil, unless fraudulent intent or criminal conduct can be proven.
Fraudulent misrepresentation is the clearest pathway for a contractual dispute to become criminal. It occurs when a person intentionally makes a false statement, knowing it to be untrue, to induce another to enter into a contract.
Examples include:
Such acts breach not only contractual duties but also criminal laws against fraud and deception. Victims may pursue both civil and criminal proceedings concurrently — civil for damages, and criminal for prosecution and deterrence.
When handled as a civil matter, the court may award one or more of the following remedies:
Courts tailor remedies based on the nature of the contract, the seriousness of the breach, and the extent of the harm caused. If the matter involves real estate or property performance issues, seeking early legal advice and finding a property lawyer can help protect contractual and financial interests.

Most contractual disputes are resolved through civil litigation because they involve private obligations and do not carry the element of intent required for criminal liability.
Civil courts provide remedies focused on fairness, efficiency, and commercial resolution, often through:
This civil process helps maintain commercial relationships while upholding legal accountability.
Australian courts typically award:
Punitive damages are rare in Australia’s contract law system, as the objective remains restitution — not punishment.
Failure to perform a contractual duty, by itself, does not constitute a criminal offence. The law recognises that non-performance may occur due to financial hardship, mistake, or impossibility (known as contractual frustration).
Only where non-performance is accompanied by intentional deception or misappropriation will criminal law apply — for example, taking payment with no intention to deliver services.
Thus, the dividing line between civil and criminal liability rests on the presence of intent to defraud.

Below are the most common legal questions about whether breach of contract is civil or criminal under Australian law.
Breach of contract is a civil matter handled in civil courts, where the injured party seeks remedies such as damages or specific performance.
Yes, but only when the breach involves fraudulent conduct, deception, or theft — not merely non-performance or neglect.
Civil courts may award damages, injunctions, or orders for specific performance, ensuring the injured party is restored to their original position.
Because contractual breaches involve private disputes, not criminal wrongdoing. Civil law offers fair and efficient remedies without criminal penalties.
Courts may grant compensatory, consequential, or liquidated damages depending on the extent and foreseeability of the loss.
In Australia, breach of contract is a civil wrong, not a criminal act. Civil courts exist to enforce agreements and provide remedies for loss, not to punish non-performance.
Yet, where deception, misrepresentation, or fraud is proven, the matter can escalate into the criminal jurisdiction — carrying serious legal consequences.
For anyone uncertain whether their case may involve civil or criminal liability, consulting a qualified contract or commercial lawyer through LegalFinda ensures accurate assessment, tailored advice, and the right path to resolution.

The LegalFinda Editorial Team is composed of qualified Australian solicitors, legal researchers, and content editors with experience across family, property, criminal, and employment law.
The team’s mission is to translate complex legislation into clear, reliable guidance that helps everyday Australians understand their legal rights and connect with the right lawyer.

.png)